Archeology Questions for MB Researchers

 1) Mahabharata Researchers say 1 rule. In history, if there is something, it is an evidence. This something can be accessed to derive a meaning. If there is nothing, then it does not mean anything. History is not logic. History means, it happened. It happened, so there must be some evidence. Well this rule should be applied to Mahabharata too. Till there is some archeology evidence, Mahabharata has no meaning in History. Mahabharata can be a great text. But, Archeology evidence is required to consider Mahabharata as history and make chronology from it. 

2) Regarding 3102 BCE Kali, 3076 BCE Yudhisthira Saka, 3667 BCE Saptarshi Era, there are no inscriptions written before 100BCE as public records. Heliodorus pillar (dated in 2nd century BCE), names sankarshana Vāsudeva. It even exhibit a verse traceable to Mahabharata. So Mahabharata was well known. But doe’s not use Kali to date it. instead, it dates the writing in kings accession year and not Kali. Nanaghat royal inscription of Sathavahanas also names Balarama & Vāsudeva krishna. It does not use Kali epoch.  Absence of evidence for Kali, Yudhisthira or saptarshi means, it was not known before 100BCE. So, first prove, it was in practice before arguing Mahabharata based on Kali epoch.

3) Guru cycle is 12 years. Shani cycle is 30 years. Other planets has faster (lesser in time) cycles. LCM is 60 years. So, we have 60 Samvatsara as a larger year cycle rather than a century (100 years). On an average we can expect 2 kings rule in one samvatsara. 100 king rule means 3000 years. Someone around 110BCE, thought next imperial king is 100th king in Kaliyuga. Vikramaditya (of Vikrama Shaka) takes birth. Varahamihira fixes kali 3000 years before. This 3000 year difference (3101 - 101BCE) between Kali and Vikramaditya birth, gives a suspicion that, it was a calculated figure. A birth was not controlled and hence it can’t be exactly 3000 years. Western jesuits working with Indian calendars probably did not understand 101st king. They used 101 from king vikram’s birth, while finalising Jesus Era (1 CE). Do, we get Kali in 3101BCE. If you are a Mahabharata researcher, you have to explain this perfect number 3000.

4) Charriot wheel question? Sanauli, UP archeology find,  conservatively dates war chariots to 2000-2200BCE. The war chariot has solid wheels. The wheels had copper fixtures to avoid wheel from cracking. So, it was not a fast moving chariot. Fast moving horse drawn chariots, like the one used by Arjuna and Krishna has to be spoked wheel chariot. So, first prove spoked wheel in your MB date (3K or 5K) before arguing Mahabharata war in 3K or 5K BCE dates.

Generally accepted time period for carts in other civilisations!

Rig Veda has references for horse and chariot. For ex..

Amarna tablets found at Syria (Mittani kingdom) puts a lower cutoff date of 1500BCE. Meaning, vedas must have been written before 1500BCE. 

5) Upper bound for Mahabharata:  Kathotia, MP Rock art . Since all warriors in this art are on horse back and non horse cart is used to carry food/ war bounty and without a human riding the cart, it shows a time period, before carts were made available to warriors. This art has to be dated as precisely as possible. This date will be the upper bound for MB war.

6) Lower bound for Mahabharata : is 2nd century BCE. By this time, Mahabharata and Vāsudeva Krishna were known to common people of India. Heliodorus pillar mentioning Krishna also validates the same.

5) We have one English word called “Barbarian’s”. This has come to English from Greek via Romans. It means savages. Greek word was Barbaras. In Mahabharata, we have the same Barbaras (in Sanskrit) fighting Mahabharata war along with Saka, Parthia, yavana etc. These tribes were ruling beyond Kabul valley in north west of India. Check MB reference below. Actually these Barbaras were Babylonians. They were called by the name Babiraus, in old Persian (DNA inscription of Darius the great). Unless Babirus introduced themselves as Barbaras, to both Greek and Indians, the name can’t be same in Greek and Sanskrit.  No other Barbaras identified in this region. Babylon comes up after 2000BCE. If Barbaras/Babylonians has to fight in 3K or 5K MB, please prove babylons existence in your MB date. Same thing with Parthia. MB says, all these were warrior tribes born out of Nandini, when kartyaveeraarjuna tries to capture that holy cow. Let them take birth from any form. You need to prove their existence archeologically first.

7) Bronze beads killings Semi precious stone exports of India, a stage that can be identified in archeology. (more bronze beads findings than stone beads). This stage/period indicates beginning of Bronze Age.

In and around 3000BCE, we still see semi precious beed making in Harappa. These were export items fetching good wealth. The existence of Beed making from fayence, lapis etc indicates, there was no cheaper alternates. Stones like lapis were available in abundance, but people in those countries did not know how to make thin holes in them. So, those stones were brought to India to turn them into beeds (jewelary). But, this trade disappears, once bronze was invented. Bronze beads imitating gold beads could be locally made at a cheaper cost than importing expensive beads from India. Harappan tried to compete, by making bronze beads also. But, due to cost differences export collapsed. Stone beads were done in abundance in 3000BCE. it indicates, absence of bronze. Absence of Bronze means, absence of iron also. That is because, iron was invented when metallurgy & smelting technology progressed from copper extraction to bronze making. Without bronze and iron, Is MB possible?

6) Question of  iron

Harpoons used to kill animals were different from spears used in battle. Harpoons evolved first. They will have “fangs”. These fangs were made to get grip inside the animals body. Idea was that, injured animal could run away, but cannot get rid of the “Weapon”. The weapon struck in the animals body will eventually retard the movement of that animal and that animal will die. Hunters would get “the prey” in a day or two. So, “prepare” the kill, if it escapes today. Another reason for fangs is hardness. Weapon was prepared using copper. Not hard enough to pierce through the body. Once iron came into the picture, fangs were not really required, as hardness of the weapons allowed deeper penetration. Deeper penetration was doing same effect of fangs. So, spears came later than harpoons. Harappa had harpoons and it was a copper culture civilisation. Design of the weapon indicates, Harappan’s did not have iron.

The entire argument is based on harappan artefact. It shows, 5000 years back, India did not had iron. Absence of iron in and around 3000 BC challenges Mahabharat date. To counter it, you have to prove harappan civilisation is “older” by 1000’s of years. This is challenge to MB researchers.

 

A fresh investigation on Colonial British History on Guptas

British Indian history has been written by equating Alexander with Chandragupta Maurya. Basis for this equation is Megasthanese Indica, where in he mentions Sandrocottus. Britishers have taken Sandrocottus=Chandragupta and whole Indian history is based on this sheet anchor. But Indian historians are arguing since 100 years that, this equation is wrong. So, this is a century old proble, still not resolved amicably.

I have a detailed peer reviewed researched paper to address this problem. The summary of the paper, I am publishing here.

My Hypothesis, Sandrocottus = Samudragupta and Greeks clearly documents their transactions with Imperial Guptas. British colonial equation is wrong. The sheet anchor 326BCE is correct, but it should be treated as Gupta Shaka epoch for working out Indian chronology.

Proof:

1) Greek account says Sandrocouptos.  SandroCouptos = Samdrogupto. (Only 1 letter error. Greek ‘nu’ used instead of Greek ‘mu’). Reading Chandragupta from Sandrocottus is primary error (be it Mauryan Chandragupta or Gupta Chandragupta). If it is not Chandragupta, Mauryans do not even come in the context.

2) Chandragupta1 (CG1) coins and inscriptions mentions him as “Chandra”. He is identified as Chandragupta1 only after Samudragupta (SG) publishes his Allahabad Prashasti, where Gupta genealogy was written. We have no king CG1 record, identifying himself as Chandragupta. That is why Delhi iron pillar Gupta Brahmi inscription has king named as Chandra only. Megasthanese naturally calls the king Xandramese = chandrama. 

10)Why Guptas has be in BCE?

A) After 1AD (Jesus) Romans were ruling. Referrence will be to “Romaka” and not to Greeks. Indians knew Romaka Siddantha.

B) Junagadh inscription of Rudradamana recalls Mauryans and Ashoka. Ashoka had a Greek Administrator/king in the area (probably defeated Greeks and reappointed the ruler as a subdued king). Rudradamana being a kshatrapa was ruling under Persian King. This was in BCE. Rudradamana recalls defeating satavahana king (his son in law) satakarni. Andhra satavahanas were ruling and Guptas not yet started. 

C) Naneghat inscription of satavahanas mentions about Vasudeva (probably early vaishnavism before Guptas). No satavahana inscription mentions about any Vishnu temple. 

D) Heliodorus , ambassador of Greeks erects Garuda pillar. Since Greeks has to be before Romans, western historians do not date this pillar later than 100BCE. 

E) Garuda is the royal emblem of Guptas. Guptas begins Vishnu temple constructions. Till Satavahanas no inscription with mention of any Vishnu temple. So, Heliodorus pillar must be coming up in front of Vishnu temple built by Guptas. 

This implies, Guptas were ruling before Heliodorus pillar and after Naneghat inscription. 

Both Rudradamana and Guptas come before Heliodorus pillar date and after Mauryans. Greek ambassadors were sent to Guptas.

Heliodorus pillar can not be before Naneghat inscription. British History puts Heliodorus in 100+BCE but satavahanas after 1AD. This is not possible from physical evidence on the ground.

British history is clearly wrong because, If, Chandragupta MAURYA was in 325 BCE (Alexander time) and Guptas were before 100BCE Heliodorus pillar, we can’t fill Mauryans to Guptas (including Satavahanas) in 225 years.

11) Alexander’s defeat has to be an epoch. Why? 

Alexander had killed Darius3 and becomes King of king of Persia. He attacks India. His defat was very big one = defeat of king of king of Persia = emperrors defeat. If we have a new Saka for defeating a western kshatrapa (who is a governor under Persian empire), then there must be a Saka for defeating Alexander. Samudragupta mentions defeat of Shai shahanu shahi = Emperror of Persia and Saka murunda = Commander of Saka = kshatrapa or Kushana who accompanies Alexander as commander of Persians or Selucus who was a commander of Alexander at that time. So, 325BC Defeat of Alexander has to be Gupta Saka. CG1 was Indian Emperror and SamudraGupta Crowned Prince.

12)  Why Gupta Saka Epoch =327BCE?

1) Reason for 326/7 BCE as GS = Alexander’s defeat after crossing Jhelam. 

2) If we take Cyrus coronation at 550BCE, and Albirunis value of 241 (4 times 60 yrs samvatsara), then 550-241=309 BCE becomes GS. Alternately, Considering 325 (exact year of Alexander’s defeat) as GS, Cyrus Saka Epoch = 325+241=566 BCE.

3) We could expect a reset to Vikrama Saka (VS) after 300yrs (5x60),means 57 +300=357 BCE should be GS and 357+241=598BCE = Cyrus Saka Epoch. (Unlikely, so upper limit)

4) we could expect a reset to Shalivahana Saka (SS) after 420 yrs (7X60), means 420-78=342 BCE= GS (could be coronation of CG1). 342+241=583BCE=Cyrus Saka Epoch.

Inscriptions with 300GS are obtained. So GS was in use for atleast 300 years. VS can come after 300 years of GS.

13) Yudheyas linking Rudradamana and Guptas.

Another key connection is yaudheya. Yaudheya people worshiped Kartikeya and called him Mahasena. They were ruling in Haryana. When Kushana subdues them, Kushana coins were minted for the region with mahasena image. Kanishka mentions about them in Rabatak inscriptions. Yaudheya was defeated by CG2, as he mentions them in Allahabad prashasti. Due to the influence of Yudheya, CG2 names his son Kumāra Gupta. Kumara gupta coins carry mahasena and peacock, just like Yudheya coins. Guptas were Vishnu devotees. Unless there is some big influence, they won’t be minting Kartikeya coins. So, Yudheya links and shows, Guptas and Kushanas overlap during their rule. Yudheya is mentioned by Rudradamana also and Junagad carries Skandagupta inscription , ruler after Kumaragupta. So, Yudheya links Kushana, Rudradamana, Shatakarni, Guptas as overlapped during their existence.

If Yudheya ruled for more than 500 years, then they must be very famous and powerfull dynasty. Many kings from the dynasty must be known. To stretch Yudheya from Rudradamana in BCE (say 200 BCE) then , Kushanas, then shungas in 100 BCE and then up to Guptas in 200+CE  will give more than 400 years rule to Yudheyas.

14) British chronology not matching important inscriptions?

As per British history (check Wikipedia)

1. Chandragupta Maurya (320-298 BCE)

2. Ashoka Maurya ( 273 - 232 BCE)

3. Rudradamana (130-150 CE)

4. Gautami putra Satakarni (78 CE - 102 CE)

5. Vasishta putra Satakarni (158-165 CE)

6. Maurya empire ( 320 - 185 BCE)

7. Archemenian Iranian empire ( 550 - 330 BCE)

8. Kushana Empire (30 CE - 375 CE) = 340 years

9. Sathavahana Empire ( 100+ BCE - 224 CE) = 300 years

10. Shunga Empire (185 BCE - 73 BCE)

11. Heliodorus pillar (113 BCE)

12. Kanishka (127 CE - 150 CE)

13. Gupta Empire (240 CE - 550CE) = 290 years.

14. CG1 (319-335CE)

15. SG (335-375 CE)

16. CG2 (380-415 CE)

17. Kumara Gupta (415-455 CE)

18. Skanda-Gupta (455-467CE)

19. Yudheya Dynasty (400+ BCE - 300+ CE)= 700 years.

1) British history gets caught in Vasishta putra sathakarni. Junagad inscription states, Rudradamana recovers lost land (to Gautamiputra) and defeats his son in law Vasishtaputra satakarni two times. But, vasistaputra satakarni is king in 158CE, while Rudradamana is dead by 150CE. How will Rudradamana defeats vasistaputra satakarni?

2) Rudradamana can be a vassal (maha kshatrapa) only to Kushanas, as archemenian empire ends due to Alexander in 330 BCE. To be precise Rudradamana was ruling under Kanishka. But we have no referrence to Kanishka from Rudradamana. kanishka has his own Saka, but Rudradamana and his dynasty inscriptions are in Cyrus Saka

3) Yudheya dynasty rules for 700 years, double than Maurya, sathavahana, Gupta etc. But we have no inscriptions or noteable kings?

4) Heliodorus pillar built before Sathavahanas started in Shunga period (113 BCE and Sathavahana start in 100 BCE). But not even 1 referrence to Vishnu temple or Garuda by Shunga or Sathavahana till Guptas in 220 CE??

"Melhua" or "Mi-Ta-Ra-Sa"??

Mihiragarh or Mehrangarh. Melhua or Mihirasa (or as Mi-Ta-Ra-Sa)??

Garh means home.  But check the first term "mehr" vs "mihir". Did half crack Europeans twisted words to derive different meaning? 

Just read, "Mehrangarh" as "Mihirgarh"....you get to see lot of meaning. It is probably the origin of sun worship or "moolasthan". "Mihir" in Sanskrit means "sun". "Mihiragarh" means "home of sun" or "Abode of sun", another name for "Moolasthan". There is no meaning to "mehar", it is an invented word by europeans. These half crack Europeans, twisted "mihiravali" as "mehrauli" in Delhi also. The place was known as mihiravali (residence of mihir, because famous Indian astronomer varaha mihir resided there). Prakrit "Mihir" is also referred to as Mitra in rigvedic Sanskrit. Mitra has become "Moitra" in Bengali. So Sanskrit word twisting is quite common when pronounciation becomes difficult. "Mitra" of sanskrit became "Maitreya" in Buddhism. "Mitraism" of Greeks. 

Now coming back to the cross reference seal of Harappans found in mesopotamia (2nd picture). This famous "shu-ilishu" seal is now housed in luvre museum at Paris. This round seal is deciphered to contain a word called "melhua". This word meluha is deciphered from the cuniform text and it's understanding. The word is widely believed to represent Indus people. But it is an interpretation..it need not point to entire Indus valley people, but could very well point to "mihirghar". 

It raises the important question, was Vedic "mihir" written as "melhua" in cuniform? Did the word transmigrate over many centuries? Alternately we could be reading "Mi-Hi-Ra-Sa" or "Mi-Ta-Ra-Sa" as "Melhua" from the wrong understanding of cuniform language (or intentional misrepresentation)?? The difference is very very marginal, but can twist and concoct a whole story/truth.

Melhua is wrongly read. It is a composition of 4 symbols. The symbols are "𒈨𒈛𒄩𒆠"). 

The first letter is clearly "Mi" and not "Me". That gives out the plot of half crack Europeans. 

Read using the original Cuniform alphabet table. "𒈨𒈛𒄩𒆠" reads as "Mi-Hi-Sa-Sa" or "Mi-Hi-Ta-Sa" or as "Mi-Hi-Ra-Sa" or as "Mi-Ta-Ra-Sa" depending on the alphabet set you use.

I have given the alphabet set and letters clearly identified.

Letter "Mi" = "𒈨"

Letter "Ta"= "𒈛"

Letter "Ra" = "𒄩"

This letter is identified as "Sa". But "Sa" has a different symbol too. Contextually, it is to be interpreted as "Ra".

Letter "Sa" = "𒆠"

Till now "𒈨𒈛𒄩𒆠" these 4 letters are read as 3 letter word "Me-Luh-Ha". The letter to letter match is not there. It is pure concoction. 

So the 4 symbols, "𒈨𒈛𒄩"  actually matches letter to letter and reads as   "Mi-Ta-Ra-Sa" or as "Mitrasa".

So the seal of "shu-ilishu" reads "Mitrasa". This is a big thing. Because, it indicates the region of "Mitra" existed in the Indus region and it was known to  Mesopotamians. Since the word "Mitra" has an origin in Vedas,, Vedic texts were also available to Harappan by that time itself. Sanskrit / prakrit was the spoken language of Harappans. Harappan or saraswati-Indus valley civilisation is the same as the Vedic civilisation of Bharath.

Now this establishes the identity of Indus civilisation people. They were called "Mitrasa" or "Mitra / sun worshippers" in their contemporary times. So we should end the confusion of naming ancient Indian civilisation as Harappa-Mahenjodaro or Indus-Saraswati Valley civilisation and call using the original name, "Mitra Civilisation".

POK Retake by India. Early Indicators

Why POK now?

PM Modi wants POK in India by Aug 2022, to celebrate India's platinum jubilee (75th year independence day). Winter is an advantage to stop ground attack from enemy. So has to happen before snow starts to melt in March-Apr. Thus year is preferred (read reasons for it below).

 

How will it be done?

Due to international pressure, War Engagement can't go beyond 10-15 days. Since quick action is required with minimal casualty, India will attempt Air space takeover only now. Since parliament has made claim on POK, India does not need any more legal framework. India need to neutralize radars & air assets threatening its planes in POK. India may take over certain airports in G&B (like Gilgit and Skardu). It can install its own air assets in POK and provide heli support to stationed troops.

If ground forces has to invade, it will be spilling lot of blood and months of fighting. So it will be done smartly in staged manner. Once POK airspace is taken, Pakistan faces disintegration challenge. Pak will be pursued to withdraw from POK, if it worries about its future existence. Pak has to either engage India to reoccupy POK airspace risking war or cede control of POK. It can't afford a war. So, it has to pull back it's Army. This diplomacy needs more than an years time. So air attack has to happen now (in 2021), before winter ends.

List of Indicators

The list of indicators will be updated till End Jan or till incident happens (earlier of the two). 

1. (18/Dec/2020) Al-Jazeera news report of pak Foreign Minister indicating, India sought approval from its partners for an attack on pak (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/12/18/pakistan-alleges-india-preparing-for-surgical). Pr-Approval indicates a planned Offencive-Defence from India. This is the first time such a thing is reported in press for Indian Army after Bangladesh liberation. Indian action on pak, was always a reaction, after a terror attack. Pak complaining for the first time about Aggressive planning from India. Pak is under severe stress & fear. Pak SC ordered rebuilding of demolished Hindhu temple in KPK, very swiftly. Imagine getting SC level order within days, that too in Pakistan on a religious matter. Police Arrested many men (100+) responsible for this attack also. Actions are out of fear now in Pakistan. Actions speaks louder than words.
2. (May-July 2020) - China occupied LAC to stop India from attacking Pak. No other reason for such a strong action from China. India ready at both borders. China also suspend OBOR construction blaming Pak corruption. But it is worried about projects future, after India taking over POK.
3. (Dec2020) - India extending war wastage stocks to 15 days from 10 days and acquiring all shortages with emergency approvals ( https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/indian-military-pushes-ahead-with-war-stockpiling/)
4. Vaccine Diplomacy - India getting an unprecedented lever in 2021. Nations can't boycott India now without hurting themselves. They will loose their citizen if they delay/block vaccine supply from India. Nations like Norway will simply go silent on Indian attacks now.
5. Unnecessary Farmers protest and blocking Delhi roads. It is a substitute of Military seize of the Indian capital to stop Delhi's actions in border. Vested interests acting in backdoor for the protests, are exposed on a daily basis.
6. Foreign minister on a 3 day visit to Srilanka. He is on a mission to force srilanka to sign a pact to deny birthing rights to Chinese military ships in Srilanka. India urgently securing it's southern waterways in Indian ocean.
7. Donald Trump - May be interested in creating complicated head aches for new administration. New president in USA 20/Jan/2021
8. China celebrating 100th birthday of CCP (ruling party) formation in July 2021. It is big show off in China. China can't afford a debacle now. Covid has dented their pride already. Any loss of face in border from Indians will harm this function and will permanently dent CCP Image. China can't take risks. It is simply posturing. World also wants to punish China for imposing Covid. India has an unparalleled support to teach a lesson to China,. China has shown it's agrression and has been caught for being on the wrong side of international law. Along with vaccine diplomacy, this world support is giving the necessary shield/protection for India's actions. India can take over Aksaichin (China occupied J&K) also now, instead of POK. India is in such a powerful position now.
9. India just entered UN SC for 2 year term. So, it can act now without bar. It is involved in UNSC meetings discussion.
10. Middle East politics has tilted in favor of India. UAE demanded return of 2 Billion $ loan from Pak and barred entry of Pak citizen. Earlier, India had to beg for repatriation of its underworld goons from gulf,. Its a huge reversal of direction. Sheiks showing national interest more than religious interests now. Pakistan has become too vulnerable without thier middle east backers.
11. Pak economy is in doll drums. COVID has ruined them on top of bad economics. Pakistan begging lifeline from creditors for its survival. Pak cut its military budget also. No money. Prices have sky rocketed. Pak can't afford a war now. If war is imposed, it will disintegrate. Politically, Opposition is doing mass nationwide protests.. They are threatening to resign enmass in Feb, if Imran khan does not resign. Baloochs and Pathan's (KPK) have increased their attacks on Pak military and are demanding Pak army to leave their territory. Pak is in its Weakest position. Best time to strike and end it's irritations. (https://theprint.in/opinion/battered-economy-brewing-uprising-in-pakistan-means-india-cant-rule-out-adventurism-in-2021/578853/)
12. USA has to end it's engagement in Afghanistan to pull out it's troops. USA wants India to take over. India insisting for POK takeover as a precondition. India is insisting to have a border with Afghanistan for such a role, as it's military needs to move in to Afghanistan if required. USA has agreed for this now. After US agreement, Chabahar port project in Iran is de-prioritized. Direct border is way cheaper to reach Afghanistan than via Iran.
13. British PM suddenly cancelling his participation as RD guest, citing Covid. He do not want to be in India, when this war happens. Britain created Kashmir conflict. If you all see, He should have been in India all the more due to Covid, at-least for a day, as Oxford vaccine is seen as a new partnership and direction between India & UK after Brexit. It Indicates, India might be striking Pak before Jan26 itself. May be before Jan20 when President switch over has to happen in USA.
14. Indian Govt can impose Covid lock-down easily and can have a better control inside country during war. Schools are closed, Citizen are maintaining highest discipline. Such a situation is not possible normally without imposing Emergency.
15. Modi Govt has stocked enough food (purchased with MSP) and has also transferred cash handouts to Farmers using DBT. It should be seen as an advanced cash assistance to poor to handle war lock-down. This indicates, Modi govt has no money shortage to wage war and it is fully prepared.
16. Anti India Nepal govt is removed now. India in control back in Nepal. China faced slap on its face for interfering in Nepal politics. Nepal will never be it's puppet.
17. (02/Jan/2021) CDS, Bipin Rawat visits forward Airbases (Assam & Arunachal) in Eastern Sector (https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/chief-of-defence-staff-general-bipin-rawat-visits-forward-bases-in-arunachal-2346978)
18. (23/Dec/2020) COAS, Gen Naravane visits forward posts ( Leh, Ladakh) in Eastern Sector (https://www.telegraphindia.com/india/india-china-clash-naravane-visits-lac-forward-posts/cid/1801460) - last visit 4/Sep/2020
19. (05/Jan/2021) Air Chief visits forward posts (Sikkim, Arunachal) in Eastern Sector.- (https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2021/jan/06/iaf-chief-rks-bhadauria-assures-arunachal-pradesh-of-full-support-during-need-2246419.html) last visit 4/Sep/2020
20. (04/Dec/2020) Govt creates new posts of Deputy Chief of Army Staff (Strategy), Director General Information Warfare (https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/govt-creates-new-posts-of-deputy-chief-of-army-staff-strategy-director-general-information-warfare/story-7m33BdXid7y3KV2ocvT3hJ.html )
21. Pakistan military put on high alert fearing an Indian attack (https://www.dawn.com/news/1594910 )
22. (09/Jan/2021) India releasing captured China soldier
23. (02/Jan/2021) Massive protest in POK due to high inflation, especially hiked prices on wheat (https://zeenews.india.com/world/pakistan-occupied-jammu-and-kashmir-boils-in-anger-inefficient-administration-plunges-region-in-inflationary-spiral-2334720.html). This protest is happening since 8/Sep/2020. 8th Sep protest was against Dam constructions in POK by China.
    
24. (09/Jan/2021) Huge protest by Shias with dead corpses of 11 miners belonging to minority Hazara community. Imran calling it as a blackmail, generated anger across nation (https://www.dawn.com/news/1600574/slain-miners-laid-to-rest-in-quettas-hazara-town)
25. (10/Jan/2021) Night 12PM, entire blackout in Pakistan
    
26. (11/Jan/2021) Pakistan Chief of Army Staff, General Qamar Javed Bajwa and Director General ISI Lt. Gen. Faiz Hamid calls on PM Imran khan. National Security situation was discussed during the meeting ( https://twitter.com/PTIofficial/status/1348633054512885763?s=20).
27. (12/Jan/2021) Annual press conference of Army chief, MM Naravane.
    Pak and China form Potent Threat, their collusivity can't be wished away . Forces on High Alert all along LAC and LOC. There was indeed a requirement of rebalancing towards northern borders and that is what we have put in place now. We are prepared to hold our ground as long it takes to achieve our national goals and objectives. Pakistan still continues with Terror as it's State policy ,We reserve our right to respond at a time and place of our choosing with precision. 
28. (15/Jan/2021) Don't test our patience: COAS Gen MM Naravane's blunt message to China on the Ladakh border row, on Army Day
29. (15/Jan/2021) Pakistan is acting on petrol pumps. It indicates petrol scarcity and black marketing. PakPMO Tweets-> Under the directions of Prime Minister 609 petrol pumps have been sealed and about 4.5 million liters of petrol & diesel have been seized in the campaign against oil smugglers in the country. 
30. (15/Jan/2021) Huge protest reported near Azad Patan bridge (entry point between Pakistan to POK) against Chinese construction of road and inflation.
31. (24/Jan/2021) PAK considering to pawn iconic 'Fatima-Jinnah' 759 Acre Public Amusement Park in the heart of Islamabad to raise Rs 500Bn loan
32. (26/Jan/2021) Delhi violence in the name of farmers tractor rally. Religious flags hoisted where national flag was ceremonially hoisted on Aug15th. 2 pictures.
33. (27/Jan/2021) -> 3rd Batch of 3 Rafales have arrived. Add to this 3 fighters delivered as 2nd Batch on Nov 4/2020 + First batch of 5 Rafales delivered on 29 July/2020. Total 11 out of 36 are in Indian kitty now(33%).
34. (28/Jan/2021) -> India is completing 50 years (Golden jubilee) since Bangladesh liberation. PM Modi Reminds this to nation. If India can fight to liberate sufferings of Bengali population, why can't it free up its own occupied lands in Kashmir, even after 50 year??
    

 

26th/Jan/2021 -> Delhi Incident photos

 

 

 

 Will India-Pak break their own previous world record??

 

 Soon Pakistan will be out of money to purchase fuel!

 

 

Pakistan is under this "dream"

 

 

India has one song answer Pak.