Monday, 19 February 2018

The history of "Mukthi Sthal", Original Somnath.



If we look from history, The present Somnath is not the original place of Jyotirling. Saraswathi river was coming and joining sea at Kutch. The first temple of Somnath was probably at a place called "Koteshwar". It is in Kutch, near sir creek and borders Pakistan. Sir-creek is a disputed territory between India & Pakisthan. Fortunately, Koteshwar is in India, and Indians can visit it with good roads. At Koteshwar we see merging of land,water (sea and river), sun, space/sky and air (land is projected in to sea [known as spits/cape in geography], sea and river are merging). That is why it was called the "Mukti kshetra". It was, Mukti kshetra because, our body is assumed to be made of "pancha bhutas" and it has to be dissolved back in to these natural forces. Once body is dissolved, atman can move forward for "Liberation". As saraswathi was "river of life", the dear ones used to come to Koteshwar to see of their departed souls. Today, we see small pond here (daya Kundh). The pond gets filled by sea water during high tides (as there is no river, they did this arrangement). People do come here (may be ones who unknowingly inherit the tradition) for doing last rites in this pond (so it is still a Mukthi Kshetra). BSF guards this area very closely. There is water shortage and hence, the place is not hyped or promoted. 2 Kms from the temple, there is a sweet water pond called "Narayana sarovar". It is just next to sea, but holds sweet water. The Sarovar has the legend of "few drops of Amrutha" falling from the Amrutha pot, while being ferried by Garuda (probably indicating to a last surviving means, after saraswathi dried up).
Sir creek area provides the proof, as it looks like a mouth of a river, although no river flows there today. Compare the area with sundarban area, where mighty Ganges merges with sea (photos are given for comparison). The fragmented sir creek points to a great river merging with sea here. Sindhu was a smaller river then, and the mighty fragmentation you see between Karachi to Koteshwar was due to saraswathi. Today Sindhu has bulged and does empty its water at Keti-Bunder. Just for comparison, there is no river mouth (fragmented land mass due to river force fragmenting land mass.) at Somanth.















The local story says that, Ravan brought the Jyotirlinga from Kailasa and was tricked to leave it here. What ever it is, the lingam here is important and it became Koteshwar today. The place became a pilgrimage point. It is like, going with the dead, as far as possible to see them off. The meeting of 5 forces at Koteshwar gave rise to the belief that, it is here, atman will enter the next stage and it could be an entry to Kailasa. However, Saraswathi river shifted east (due to Himalayan disturbances). As, the river shifted, it met sea at todays Somanath (At Patan also they say, saraswathi was flowing. Today they say, locals out of respect kept saraswathi name to local rivers and hence you see sarasawathi at different places. But that is not how it is). As life line river is important to call a place "Mukti stal", new temple came up here as the new Jyotirlinga. The focus shifted from Koteshwar to Somnath. There is a triveni sangam at somnath (meeting of 3 rivers and one is saraswathi, which they say is gupt now). This sangam place is again a famous "Mukthi Sthal. During earthquake, floods and river destruction, Koteshwar probably got submerged in sea. May be that was another reason to abandon it and construct new temple at Somanth. The submerged Koteshwar was forgotten all together as the original "Jyotirling" place.

Unfortunately, the tributaries of saraswathi shifted further east , causing them to merge with Yamuna and Ganges. Ganges took the place of saraswathi. As the migrated people settled in new found land, majority of the priestly class of people from somnath, who were habituated to perform "Mukti rites" got settled in Kashi/Varanasi. Although sea is missing, river ganges substituted for water. Sun at Koteshwar was replaced by "fire". So, Ghats on the river front came up, where they could burn the bodies. Priestly class continued their process at Kashi itself. For the process to continue, A new Jyotirling temple came up at Kaashi. So, Kaashi became the primary Mukthi sthal (replacing earlier Koteshwar and Somnath). The status of Kaashi is maintained since then as the primary "Mukti sthal" and a place of Jyotirling for Hindus.

However some people did not migrate to Ganges, but migrated south using ships (over sea) and reached Karnataka. You can see a place called "Koteshwar" in coastal Karnataka. You can also see a place called Someshwar (due to temple Somnath near mangalore) in the same belt. Surprisingly, this Koteshwar is also called as "Mukthi sthal". Infact the migrated people settled at 7 places along the karnataka coast line. All seven are called "Saptha Mukthi Kendras" even today. Gokarna is the primary one (known to people). The Ravana story of Gokarna is same as the one at Koteshwar, Kutch, Gujarat (google to check). All these 7 places contain Shivalingms, a replica of the original Jyotirlingams. (How can so many things happen co-incidentaly??). The migrated priestly class on ships settled down south in western part of the country (and did not go east), as they wanted setting sun to do "Mukthi process". Other priestly class people, who did migrate towards east, later came down south (majority settled near Godavari river) and then at a later point came further down to Karnataka. We can see huge difference in language/customs and tradition between these 2 sects of people, although they all stay in the same area today. "Aghanashini river" comes and meets Arabian sea at Gokarna. Sun sets here. Mahabaleshwar temple is just on the shores. A pond called "Koti teertha" is there very close to mahabaleshwara temple. Koti means "crore" in kannada. May be the pond was constructed by bringing original water from Koteshwar, Gujarat. Guess what, there is a "Lingam" in the center of this pond and it is called "Koteshwara". So, at Gokarna, technically we still see setting sun,sea,river, sky and air merging together in the backdrop of Mahabaleshwar temple. The idea, still matches with the original "Mukthi sthal". Who knows, during that twilight moment, the door to Kailasa may be open [see the beautiful image at Dwarka that illustrates the concept effectively (Gomati river meeting Arabian sea at Dwarka temple)]. As migrated people replicated their place, if we search originality for Gokarna, it may match with Karachi. The Mahalingeshwara Temple may be a replication of "Ratneshwar Mahadev" temple, located at clifton, karachi. If we see, krachi/koteshwara/somanath, the same is replicated in Karnataka as Gokarna/Koteshwara/Smeshwara....Can it simply be a coincidence?
Now, the sea water has receded and we can see original Koteshwar back. A nice temple is built there (probably somebody inherited the truth and protects it!!). Due to ignorance or due to forgotten history, Koteshwar was saved from invaders. So, our original "Somnath" is intact. Koteshwar qualify as the best place for a Jyotirling and as a Mukti Sthal. The tropic of cancer, passes here. As sun peaks on tropic of cancer, the place becomes the unique place in India, for receiving maximum sun energy + a sea coast + mouth of a mighty river saraswathi + the land projecting in to sea, as though merging with it + high winds from sea + vast blue sky meeting the horizon. All 5 forces (wind/water/land/fire (sun)/sky) are to the maximum size here. So, it is the unique and best place. So, there is lot of deep thought behind the first Jyotirlinga place. The tropic of cancer passes through, Ujjain, which also hosts a "Jyotirlinga" called Maha Kala (as it was the time reference point).

Dwaraka, Kanyakumari and Rameshwaram are the other places, where we see land tip projecting in to sea (Use google map to survey for the best land area projecting in to sea, you will find these). At Rameshwaram + Dwaraka we do have a Jyotirlinga. Kanyakumari (Cape Comorin) we see both setting sun + rising sun (indicating a rebirth in the womb of a women). So, We have the "Kanya Kumari" temple at this important place( a representation for shivas consort parvathi). Adi-Shankara called the area surrounding this pinnacle point (kanyakumari) as "Tra-vida", that is meeting of land with 3 seas (east/west & south), which later became "Dravida".

I think other Jyotirlingas came up, as land area get fragmented among different kingdoms and people were not allowed to move freely to reach original places. With no other option, they replicated Jyotirlings with in their territory (this is my guess, as we need to build history by filling blank places, when concrete proof / logical reasons does not support it).

Probably, the late Harappans visited Koteshwara, like we visit Vaaranasi today. As we miss saraswathi, we miss the real action here.

Thursday, 1 February 2018

New findings in Aihole Inscription..that determine Mahabharatha war

mahabhart_date


The Aihole Inscription of Ravi Kirti at the Meguti temple, a minister and poet in the court of Badami Chalukya King, Pulakesi II, is in Sanskrit language and old Kannada script. It is considered one of the finest pieces of extant poetry in the Sanskrit language and is a eulogy of King Pulakesi II and his conquests.

File:Aihole inscription of Ravi Kirti.jpg


The full transcription of the inscription in English can be read here
(https://cbkwgl.wordpress.com/2015/01/19/chalukya-pulakesis-aihole-inscription/)


Aihole inscription has following important lines

sloke-1

Trinshatsu Trisahasreshu Bhaaratdahavaditaha | Saptabda Shatayukteshu Gateshwabdeshu Panchasu | Panchashatasu Kalaukale Shatasu Panchashatsu cha | Samatsu Samatitasu Shakaanamapi Bhoobhujaam ||



Till now people read it like this
" ‘3,735 (30+3000+700+5) years have already elapsed since Bharatha war" and 556 (50 + 6 + 500) years since shaka era is running (on this date of engraving this inscription)’.

Considering shalivahana saka as 78AD (Note this is assumption)
a) 78+556 = The Incription is dated as 634 AD
b) 3735 - 634 = 3101 BC is set as Mahabharatha war.

Problem here is
1) No body explained why the years are splits like 3000/30/50/6/500 etc..
2) Shaka era assumed to be Shalivahan shaka, although there is no proof, it has replaced Vikrama Shaka by that time in south.

Let us Re-analyse the words
a) Trinshatsu Trisahasreshu Bhaaratdahavaditaha => 30+3000 since "Death of hero of Bharathawar". This points Krihnas death Krishna (who supervised bharatha war and killed because of it due to curse of Gandhari) . So, It points to kaliyuga beginning and not to Bharatha war. Here 3000 year points to Bharatha war and 30 years represent Krishnas death after war. So, 30 and 3000 are given separately. So, it means 3030 years has passed since Bharatha war and 3000 years since Krishnas death (probably this stone is sculpted here to mark this mile stone of 3000 also!).

b) Saptabda Shatayukteshu Gateshwabdeshu Panchasu Panchashatasu => First word is clear 7X 100 = 700. after this word we see "Gata", which means past. Then we see 2 words, "aswa+abdha". Aswa means "horse", Abda means Sea. These words are simple discounted. But these words are not simply inserted here. "Panchasu Panchashatasu" Panchasu Panchashatasu means 55 years. So, if we add all, it means, 700 years back has passed since 55 years of horses coming from sea. This indicates 55 years of horse import happened from sakas before 700 years (May be sea trade stopped with sakas due to a war, so the year since this crucial horse import (via sea) stopped 700 years back, which was counted due to strategic importance is also mentioned).


We need to consider this (breaking of Mauryan rules on sea trade) as in the same inscription the following lines appear,


(V. 20.) In the Konkanas the impetuous waves of the forces directed by Him speedily swept away the rising wavelets of pools – the Mauryas. (and pallavas too). So the sea ports that could bring "Arabian horses" were taken after long time (since maurayan times).


After breaking Konkan, Pulakeshi attacks other kingdoms by sea, as seen by the lines followed...

(V. 21.) When, radiant like the destroyer of Pura, He besieged Puri, the Fortune of the western sea, with hundreds of ships in appearance like arrays of rutting elephants, the sky, dark – blue as a young lotus and covered with tiers of massive clouds, resembled the sea, and the sea was like the sky.


Also the famous Ajantha painting of Pulakeshi 2s court scene shows envoys from Persia (the dressing is very clear). Also note the horses were standing with Persian people at the door.  Does this represent restart-of horse trade with Arabaia?? Horse trade was a major political statement of strengthening military in India. The name "horse trade" is so accustomed that any legislator switching parties is considered as "Horse trading" even today. If there was a blockade due to Ashoka to trade horse down south without his notice (or subsequent blockade by coastal kingdoms like  Konkan), Karnataka military power was stunted. Pulekeshin-2 breaking such a blockade marks a major event. That is why this painting is done in Ajantha. How can such a "major event" will be missing in an inscription like that of "Ravikeerthi", that lists all the achievements of pulekeshi-2?

From the wrong dating, the emissaries are  written in all publication as, they are from King Khusru-2 of sassanian empire of persia. What is the basis for such a claim is not clear.

Image result for ajantha khusru ambassador pulakeshi 2


c) Kalaukale Shatasu Panchashatsucha => Kalukale means "now/ this year running" (6 and 500) is 506 years passed
d) Samatsu Samatitasu Shakaanamapi.... => as year after year from "Shaka".

As popular in north, if we take Vikrama shaka  (57 BC), Then the numbers works out like this....
1) Running year = 506 - 57 = 449 AD
2) Bharatha war = 3030 - 449 =  2581 BC
c) Kaliyuga start = 3000 - 449 =  2551 BC
d) Horses by sea started to come to South India = 755-449 = 306 BC (Pointing to Megasthanese period!!)
e) Horse trade stopped = 251 BC  (May be due to Ashokan controls on horse trade)

What is contradictory here 

Main objection would be putting pulakeshi 2 at 449 AD would be that, the same inscription refers "Harsha". We have strong evidence of HiuensTsang meeting Harshavardhana in 643 AD (from Chinese sources). Equating Harshavardhana with pulekeshin from this aihole inscription, historians anchored pulekeshin to 7th century. However, there is no evidence that, "Harsha" in the inscription is same as "Harshavardhana". As Harsha doesnot carry a Dynansty name in the inscription, it is attributed to Harshavardhana. But that may not be correct. Note the inscription is poetic. Before the line where "Harsha" is mentioned, it talks about 3 powerful regions Latas, Malvas and Gurjaras becoming feudatories. So, the "Harsha" here mean the "Happiness" of the kings of these region. Harsha of the inscription doesnot ascribe to king Harsha. As there are no other records of war between Harshavardhana and King pulakeshin 2, it is just a tale to link them. Harshacharitha of Banabhatta does not mention this encounter (argument for that is, Harshcharitha is meant to praise the king and hence it does not count his defeats).  

The Aihole inscription mentions most of the kingdoms of north. It even mentions "a segment of Mauryans". But "Guptas are absent. As Guptas were in the recent past (like pallavas, chera, chola etc), Guptas should have come in the inscription. But no mention about Guptas. This has to be explained.


 Gandharis Referrence

Gandhari was, initially and many more times subsequently, checked by Vyasa from any kind of unfortunate utterance in anger; at one sight she got so overwhelmed with grief and anger that she cursed Govind (Sri Krishna) in the following words in Slokas 43, 44 and 45 of the twenty fifth chapter of the Stri Parva of the Mahabharata:




Image may contain: text
“O Govind, since you have overlooked the Kauravas and Pandavas fighting and destroying each other, you will also be a destroyer of your own people. In the 36th year from now, your brothers, sons and nobles will also destroy each other in a similar fashion and wandering in the forest you will meet your end in an ignoble manner.”

Again, there is a description in the Mausala Parva of the Mahabharata about how Sri Krishna observed the ominous circumstances at the commencement of the 36th year after the war of Mahabharata and said thus in Sloka 21 of the second chapter (18: 6467):


 
The time has come for the fulfillment of the curse laid by Gandhari when she was tormented and afflicted by sorrow on account of the slaying of her people.
Wishing to see the fulfillment of the curse Sri Krishna advised the Yadavas to move to Prabhasha Tirtha where after getting drunk they destroyed each other in the ensuing fight.


Ravikeerthi has taken 30 instead of 36. The beginning word of the line shoula have been,  "षट्त्रिंशत्" . May be for composition purpose or some other reason, it is truncated as, "त्रिंशत् " 

So, if we add 6 years Mahabharata war was 3036 years since the date of inscription. That means, war happened in 2587 BC.


Now let us see what Vaharamihara states in Brihatsamhita (15: XIII.3, pp.207-08)
sloke-2 

The Munis (Sapta Rishis) were in Magha when king Yudhisthira ruled the earth, the period of that king was 2526 years before the Saka era.
Considering saka is vikrama saka, this works out to be
2526+57 BC = 2583 BC => Yudhistira was ruling (2587 BC is mahabharatha war and Yudhistira was crowned after that. Note Varahamira says "shasati", which means, he was already ruling. Varahamira does not say, the celestial event of spatrshi in Magha happened during crowning or during Mahabhartha war.

So, Varahamihira concurs with the Aihole Inscription.
Due to wrong interpretation of Aihole inscription, it was not matching with varhamihira, Vrudha gargha and kalhana panditha (all concurs with Vaharamihira). Kalhan pandithas dating not matching with "Aihole" inscripton was used as the the major objection and criticism point for the dating of Mahabharatha. Now, this objection should fall flat.


Now let us see  what Aryabhata stated in Aryabhateeyam...
Scholars state that,

It is said that Sage Vaisya, the author of Mahabharata, warned Dhritarashtra of the planetary augury which were a conjunction of Saturn with Aldebaran, a lunar eclipse near Pleiades ( an open cluster of hot blue stars in the constellation Taurus), retreating Mars before reaching Antares ( the brightest star in the constellation Scorpius).
 

The fifth century mathematician Aryabhatta calculated this date to be approximately 3100 BC.  
 (But no specific referrence is given to 3100 BC statement. Obviously Aryabhata did not know AD/BC etc. If at all he states, it should be with Kalikala or with reference to Vikrama shaka. 3100BC of Aryabhata is again derived figure, by putting aryabhata simply at 5th CE. What Aryabhata states is that).

"When the three yugas (satya yuga, treta yuga and dwapara yuga) have elapsed and 60 x 60 (3,600) years of kali yuag have already passed, I am now 23 years old.
  

So, Aryabhata is not establishing any date (like 3102 BC for mahabharata war). He only uses it to indicate his year of writing and his age. So, Aryabhata wrote Aryabhateeyam in 

3600 - 2581  = 1019 AD (Aryabhata was 23 year old).

But many Historians do not want to see him in 11th CE but in 5th CE. So, it is tweaking Mahabharatha war time. 

Now let us see  what Alberuni states...

Alberuni’s gauge-year is 1031 A.D. (16: Volume II, p.7). There was no difference of opinion about the beginning of Kaliyuga at his time. He writes, “Regarding the time which has elapsed since the beginning of the kaliyuga, there exists no difference amounting to whole years. According to both Brahmagupta and Pulisa, of the kaliyuga there have elapsed before our gauge-year 4132 years, and between the wars of Bharata and our gauge-year there have elapsed 3479 years. The year 4132 before the gauge-year is the epoch of the Kalikala, and the year 3479 before the gauge-year is the epoch of the Pandavakala.” (16:Vol.II, pp.4-5)


4132 years before Gauge year (1031 AD) => 4132-1031 = 3101 BC (What happened here to call it as kalikala has to be seen, although he says no division of opinion). 

3479 years before Gauge year (1031) => 4132-1031 = 2448 BC (103 years After Bharatha war of 2551 BC) 

What they denote is not clear. May be alburuni was misguided completely. 
Alburunis 3101BC reference was used to justify wrong interpretation of Aihole Inscription. But Alburuni statement itself is wrong as he "predates" kalikala before  "Pandavas". Indian scriptures consistently say, till krishnas death, It was "Dwapara Yuga". 

References (Read them to understand the issue in depth)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Sharing of finding from Ramaka Sakala
2) http://new.resurgentindia.org/the-overwhelming-evidence-in-favour-of-the-traditional-indian-date-for-the-beginning-of-the-kaliyuga-and-the-mahabharata-war/#prettyPhoto
3) http://www.thetinyman.in/2015/11/scientific-date-of-mahabharata-war-from.html
4)http://www.ece.lsu.edu/kak/MahabharataII.pdf
5)https://www.speakingtree.in/blog/the-scientific-dating-of-the-mahabharat-war 
6)https://www.quora.com/How-old-are-the-Mahabharata-and-Ramayana/answer/Sunil-Sheoran


In Kannada: (From Ramka Sakala)
-------------------- -----------------------------------

ರವಿಕೀರ್ತಿಯು ಐಹೊಳೆಯ ಮೇಗುಟಿಯ ಜಿನದೇವಾಲಯದ ಶಾಸನ ಮಹತ್ತರವಾದುದು. ಅದು ಕಾಲಗಣೆನೆ ಮಾಡುವ ಕಲಿಯುಗಾಬ್ದವನ್ನು ತಿಳಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
ಈ ಶಾಸನದಲ್ಲಿ ಬರುವ ಸಾಲುಗಳು

sloke-1

ತ್ರಿಂಶತ್ಸು ತ್ರಿಸಹಸ್ರೇಷು ಭಾರತಾದಾಹವಾದಿತಃ |
ಸಪ್ತಾಬ್ದ ಶತಯುಕ್ತೇಷು ಶ(ಗ)ತೇಷ್ವಬ್ದೇಷು ಪಂಚಸು ||
ಪಂಚಾಶತ್ಸು ಕಲೌ ಕಾಲೇ ಷಟ್ಸು ಪಂಚಶತಾಸು ಚ |
ಸಮಾಸು ಸಮತೀತಾಸು ಶಕಾನಾಮಪಿ ಭೂಭುಜಾಮ್ ||
ಶಾಸನದ 16ನೇ ಸಾಲಿನಲ್ಲಿನ ಈ ಶ್ಲೋಕ ಬಹಳ ಮಹತ್ವವನ್ನು ಪಡೆಯುತ್ತದೆ.
ಅ) ಇದರಲ್ಲಿ ಮಹಾಭಾರತದ ಯುದ್ಧವರ್ಷವನ್ನು "೩೭೩೫ " ಎಂದು ಹೇಳಲಾಗಿದೆ. (೩೦+೩೦೦೦+೭೦೦+೫).
ಆ) ಇದಲ್ಲದೆ ಈ ಶಾಸನವು 556ನೇ ಶಕಕಾಲವು ನಡೆಯುತ್ತಿದ್ದುದನ್ನು ಜ್ಞಾಪಿಸುತ್ತಿದೆ.
ಇದನ್ನು ಹೊಸದೃಷ್ಟಿ ಇಂದ ನೋಡಿದರೆ....

1) ತ್ರಿಂಶತ್ಸು ತ್ರಿಸಹಸ್ರೇಷು ಭಾರತಾದಾಹವಾದಿತಃ - 3030 ವರ್ಷ್ ಮಹಾಭಾರತ ಯುದ್ದದ್ದು, ಮತ್ತೆ ಮೂವತ್ತು ವರ್ಷ್ ಕೃಷ್ಣಾ ಸಾಯುವಾಗಿನ ಸಮಯ ಅಂತ. ಅಂದರೆ ೩೦0೦ ವರ್ಷದ ಹಿಂದೆ ಕಲಿಯುಗ ಶುರುವಾಗಿದ್ದು. ೩೦೦೦ ವರ್ಷ್ ಕಳೆದ ನೆನಪಿಗೆ ಈ ಶಾಸನದಲ್ಲಿ ಈ ರೀತಿ ಬರೆಯಲಾಗಿದೆ.

2) ಸಪ್ತಾಬ್ದ ಶತಯುಕ್ತೇಷು  -> ೭೦೦ ವರ್ಷ ಗಳ ಹಿಂದೆ

3) (ಗ)ತೇಷ್ವಬ್ದೇಷು ಪಂಚಸು ಪಂಚಾಶತ್ಸು -> ಇದರಲ್ಲಿ "ಅಶ್ವ" ಅನ್ನುವ ಪದ ಮತ್ತು "ಅಬ್ದ" ಅನ್ನುವ ಪದದ ಜೊತೆ ಕೂಡಿ ಕಾಣುತ್ತಿದೆ. ಮತ್ತೆ ಇದಕ್ಕೆ ಸೇರುವ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆ ೫೫. ಇದರ ಅರ್ಥ, ಸಾಗರದ ಮೂಲಕ ಕುದರೆ ತಂದದ್ದು, ಏಳುನಾರ ವರ್ಷಗಳ ಹಿಂದೆ, ೫೫ ವರ್ಷ್ಗಳ ತನಕ ನಡೆಯಿತು ಅಂತ, ಅಂದರೆ, ೫೫ ವರ್ಷ್ ಶಕರ ಜೊತೆ ಹಡಗಿನಲ್ಲಿ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಕಟ್ಟಲು ಕುದುರೆ ವ್ಯಾಪಾರ ಮಾಡಿದ್ದಿರಬಹುದು. ಈ ಕುದರೆ ವ್ಯಾಪಾರ, ದಕ್ಷಿಣಕ್ಕೆ ಬರುವುದನ್ನು, ಸಾಮ್ರಾಟ್ ಅಶೋಕ ರಾಜಕೀಯ ಕಾರಣಗಳಿಗಾಗಿ ನಿಲ್ಲಿಸಿದ್ದಿರಬಹುದು. ಅರೇಬಿಯಾದ ಕುದುರೆಗಳು ಸೈನ್ಯ ಶಕ್ತಿಗೆ ಬಹಳ ಸಹಾಯ ಮಾಡುತ್ತಿತ್ತು. ಇದು ಪ್ರಮುಖವಾಗಿದ್ದರಿಂದ, ಈ ರೀತಿ ಬರೆಸಿರಬಹುದು.

4) ಕಲೌ ಕಾಲೇ ಷಟ್ಸು ಪಂಚಶತಾಸು ಚ -> ೫0೬ ವರ್ಷ ಶಕ ವರ್ಷದಿಂದ ನಡೆದು ಈಗಿನ ಕಾಲಕ್ಕೆ ಬಂದಿದ್ದೇವೆ. ವಿಕ್ರಮ ಶಕೆಯನ್ನು ಪರಿಗಣಿಸಿದರೆ ( ೫೦೬ ವರ್ಷ - ೫೭ ಬಿ ಸಿ) = ೪೪೯ ಎ. ಡಿ ಆಗುತ್ತದೆ.
ದಕ್ಷಿಣದಲ್ಲಿ "ಶಕ ಅಂದರೆ ಶಾಲಿವಾಹನ ಶಕೆ. ಇದು ಬಹಳ ಉಪಯೋಗದಲ್ಲಿದೆ. ಆದರೆ ಉತ್ತರದಲ್ಲಿ ವಿಕ್ರಮ ಶಕೆ ಬಳಕೆಯಲ್ಲಿತ್ತು. ಶಾಲೀವಾಹನ ಹಾಗೂ ವಿಕ್ರಮ ಎರಡೂ ಉತ್ತರಭಾರತದ್ದು. ಅವುಗಳ ಬಳಕೆ ದಕ್ಷಿಣದಲ್ಲಿ ಯಾವಾಗಿನಿಂದ ಶುರುವಾಯಿತು ಎನ್ನುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಪುರಾವೆ ಇಲ್ಲ. ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಹೇಳುತ್ತಿರುವ ರವಿಕೀರ್ತಿಯು ಕಾಲಕ್ಕೆ ಯಾವ ಶಕೆ ಅನ್ವಯವಾಗುತ್ತದೆ ಅನ್ನುವುದು ಶಾಸನದಿಂದ ತಿಳಿಯುವುದಿಲ್ಲ. ಪಂಡಿತರು ಶಾಲಿವಾಹನ ಶಕೆಯನ್ನು ಬಳಸುತ್ತಾರೆ. ಆದರೆ ವಿಕ್ರಮ ಶಕೆ ಹಿಂದಿನದ್ದು. ಇಲ್ಲಿ ಶಕರೊಂದಿಗಿನ ಕುದುರೆ ವ್ಯಾಪಾರ ನೆನಪಿಸುತ್ತಿರುವುದರಿಂದ, ಅದು ಹಿಂದಿನ ವಿಕ್ರಂ ಶಕೆ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುವುದು ಸೂಕ್ತ.

ಇವೆಲ್ಲವನ್ನೂ ಪರಿಗಣಿಸಿ ಶಾಸನದ ಕಾಲ ೪೪೯ ಎ . ಡಿ ಅಂದರೆ,

ಅ) ಮಹಾಭಾರತ ನಡೆದ್ದದು ೪೪೯ ಎ . ಡಿ ಗಿಂತ ೩೦3೦ ವರ್ಷ್ ಹಿಂದೆ. ಅಂದರೆ ೨೫೫೧ ಬಿ.ಸಿ ಯಲ್ಲಿ
ಆ) ಕೃಷ್ಣ ಸತ್ತದ್ದು (ಮತ್ತು) ಕಲಿಯುಗ ಶುರುವಾಗಿದ್ದು ೩೦0೦ ವರ್ಷ್ ಹಿಂದೆ. ಅಂದರೆ ೨೫೮೧ ಬಿ ಸಿ ಯಲ್ಲಿ
ಇ) ಕುದುರೆ ಹಡಗಿನಿಂದ ಬಂದದ್ದು ೭೫೫ ವರ್ಷ್ ಹಿಂದೆ. ಅಂದರೆ ೩೦೬ ಬಿ. ಸಿ ಯಲ್ಲಿ. ಇದು ಮೆಗಾಸ್ತನೀಸ್ ರಾಯಭಾರಿಯಾಗಿದ್ದ ವರ್ಷ.
ಈ) ಕುದುರೆ ವ್ಯಾಪಾರ ನಿಂತದ್ದು, ೭೦೦ ವರ್ಷ್ ಹಿಂದೆ. ಅಂದರೆ ೨೫೧ ಬಿ ಸಿ ಯಲ್ಲಿ. ಈ ಸಮಯದಲ್ಲಿ ಅಶೋಕ ಬಹಳ ಪ್ರಭಾವನಾಗಿದ್ದ.

ಈ ಕಾಲ ನಿರ್ಣಯ ಸರಿಯಾ ಎನ್ನುವುದಕ್ಕೆ ಇನ್ನೊಂದು ಪುರಾವೆ ಬೇಕಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಈಗ ಮಹಾಭಾರತದ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಪ್ರಸಿದ್ಧ ಖಗೋಲತಜ್ಞ, ವರಾಹಮಿಹಿರ ಹೇಳಿರುವುದನ್ನು ಗಮನಿಸಿ (ಚಿತ್ರದಲ್ಲಿ ಕೊಟ್ಟಿದೆ).

 sloke-2

ಶಕವರ್ಷಕ್ಕೆ , ೨೫೨೬ವರ್ಷ್ ಮೊದಲು ಯುಧಿಷ್ಠಿರನ ರಾಜ್ಯಭಾರ ಸ್ಥಾಪಿಸಿರುವಾಗ. ಸಪ್ತರ್ಷಿಮಂಡಲ ಮಖಾ ನಕ್ಷತ್ರದಲ್ಲಿ ಇತ್ತು.

ಅಂದರೆ ೫೭ಬಿ ಸಿ + ೨೫೨೬ = ೨೫೮೩ ಬಿಸಿ. ರವಿಕೀರ್ತಿಯ ಶಾಸನ ೨೫81೧ ರಿಂದ (ಮಹಾಭಾರತ ಯುದ್ಧ ಮುಕ್ತಯದಿಂದ) ೨೫5೧ರ ಬಿಸಿ ತನಕ (ಕೃಷ್ಣ ಮರಣಿಸುವವರೆಗೆ) ಯುಧಿಷ್ಠಿರನ ರಾಜ್ಯಭಾರ ಇತ್ತು ಅಂದು ತೋರಿತ್ತದೆ. ಇದು ಮಹಾಭಾರತದ ಯುದ್ಧಕಾಲವನ್ನೇ ತೋರಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.
ಪುರಾಣದ ಪ್ರಕಾರ, ಗಾಂಧಾರಿ ಕೃಷ್ಣನಿಗೆ ೩೬ವರ್ಷಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಯಾದವರ ಕುಲ ನಾಶವಾಗಲಿ ಅನ್ನುವ ಶಾಪ ಕೊಡುತ್ತಾಳೆ. ಇದನ್ನು ೪೩, ೪೪ ಮತ್ತು ೪೫ನೇ ಶ್ಲೋಕ, ಮಹಾಭಾರತದ ೨೫ನೇ ಅಧ್ಯಾಯ ವಾದ, ಸ್ತ್ರೀ ಪರ್ವದಲ್ಲಿ ಬಂದಿದೆ.

Image may contain: text


ರವಿಕೀರ್ತಿ ಇದನ್ನು ೩೦ ಅಂತ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಂಡಿರಬಹುದು (ಷಟ್ ತ್ರಿಂಶತ್ಸು ಅಂತ ಶುರುವಾಗಬೇಕಾದ ಶ್ಲೋಕ, ತ್ರಿಂಶತ್ಸು ಅಂತ ಶುರುವಾಗುತ್ತದೆ !!) . ಈ ೩೬ ವರ್ಷ್ ಅಂತ ಮಾರ್ಪಾಟು ಮಾಡಿದರೆ, ಮಹಾಭಾರತದ ಯುದ್ಧ ಕಾಲ ೨೫೮೭ ಬಿ ಸಿ ಆಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಅಂದರೆ ೨೫೮೩ ರಲ್ಲಿ ಯುಧಿಷ್ಠಿರನ ರಾಜ್ಯಭಾರ ನಡೆಯುವಾಗ, ಮಖ ನಕ್ಷತ್ರ ಕ್ಕೆ ಸಪ್ತರ್ಷಿಮಂಡಲ ಬಂದಿತ್ತು. ಇದು ಕರಾರುವಕ್ಕಾಗಿ ಹೋಲುತ್ತದೆ.

ಇದು ಸರಿಯಿದ್ದರೆ ಬಹಳಷ್ಟು ಐತಿಹಾಸಕ ಘಟನೆಗಳನ್ನು ನವೀಕರಿಸಬೇಕಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಉ. ದಾ
ಆರ್ಯಭಟನನ್ನು ಐದನೇ ಶತಮಾನದಲ್ಲಿ ಇದ್ದವನು ಅಂತ ಈಗ ಭಾವಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ. ಈತ ತನ್ನ ಆರ್ಯಭಟೀಯಂನಲ್ಲಿ ಹೀಗೆ ಹೇಳುತ್ತಾನೆ

"ಸತ್ಯ, ತ್ರೇತಾ ಹಾಗೂ ದ್ವಾಪರ ಯುಗ ಮುಗಿದು ಈಗ 60x60 ಅಂದರೆ ೩೬೦೦ ವರ್ಷ ಆಗಿದೆ , ಈಗ ನನಗೆ ೨೩ ವರ್ಷ".

ಕಲಿಯುಗಾರಂಭ - 2581 ಬಿ ಸಿ. ೩೬೦೦-೨೫೮೧ = ೧೦೧೯ ಅಂದರೆ ೧೧ನೇ ಶತಮಾನ.

ಈ ರೀತಿ ವಾದ ಸರಣಿ ಇತಿಹಾಸವನ್ನು ಬುಡಮೇಲು ಮಾಡಬಹುದು. ಆದ್ದರಿಂದ, ಇದರ ಬಗ್ಗೆ ಹೆಚ್ಚು ತಿಳಿದವರು ವಿಮರ್ಶೆ ಮಾಡಬಹುದು.