Western scholars came with the theory that "Aryans' came from middle east to India. They even say, the Indus valley people who were natives of India were driven south. There are no archaeological or literary "proof" for this theory. It was coined to divide "fair"skin Punjabi kind of population with "dark" skinned Tamil kind if population. Brahmins in south were depicted as "Aaryan " migrants from north. This is again to stroke anger with local population and set them against Brahmins. Britishers knew strength of India was based on its traditional knowledge protected by Brahmin community. British wanted to dislodge this base, so they can convert locals in to Christianity easily. It did not work to their expectations. Brahmin community should realise these historical facts.
On the contrary to Aaryan migration, there are counter proofs that exists to substantiate Indians actually migrated to other parts to spread the advancement happened in India. This is evident in Buddhism spread to east.
There is another strange link that emerged due to plight of yazdis in Syria. Some one has made a video collaborating the similarities to Tamil culture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX-g587ral0
The peacock (that never lived in middle east) , the snake to the "Leaf Torana" tied to the arch way at the yezdi temple door in Iraq, unmistakably indicates something.
On the contrary to Aaryan migration, there are counter proofs that exists to substantiate Indians actually migrated to other parts to spread the advancement happened in India. This is evident in Buddhism spread to east.
There is another strange link that emerged due to plight of yazdis in Syria. Some one has made a video collaborating the similarities to Tamil culture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX-g587ral0
The peacock (that never lived in middle east) , the snake to the "Leaf Torana" tied to the arch way at the yezdi temple door in Iraq, unmistakably indicates something.
The oldest Brahmin community in South actually come from Sthanika Brahmins, often called as Nadagaars/Naadgers (Indigenous Landlords), literally translated as Deshashta and dates back to 480 C. BC.
ReplyDeleteFrom Nada the other derivates are
Nadu, Naidu, Naadgaar, Naadgeru, Naadkar, Naadkarnis.
The Sthanikas are also called the descendants of the Moolasthana (Multan) or Pirak in Pakistan from Indus basin.
The Indus valley HaploGroup L-M20 is highest in people of West Karnataka, North Karnataka and in some communities like Koraga tribes it reaches up to 68%.
All Major Kannada rulers had Naadger brahmin (Deshashta) who later got converted to Paishaci (Predecessor of Konkani) or Marathi through marital ties perhaps. That is why many of these Konkanashta/Deshashta brahmins have surnames arising from Kannada or Karnataka.